Most Popular
Recently Added
Recently Updated

Why are OT numbers lower than log files and other stats programs?


Why are numbers recorded by Opentracker often lower than numbers recorded in log files & returned by log file analysis programs such as webtrends, hitbox, awstats, etc?


The challenge & answer is to determine where the main discrepancies lie when comparing stats programs, and when comparing a tracking program to the process of log file analysis.

The explanation comes down to a comparison of what is being counted. This is a good example of the origin of the expression 'comparing apples & oranges".

Some people are a bit disappointed, when they first scrutinize their Opentracker results, due to the low numbers. This is especially true if "hits" have been used as a measurement in the past. Technically, a "hit" is part of server-browser dialogue, and does not tell you how many actual people were on a site. Opentracker was built to make "real" numbers more accessible.

Opentracker is a very strict counter (which is an intentional feature of the design). Opentracker only counts human visitors, also known as "human events". There is a large amount of traffic on the internet, an estimated 25% or less of which are "human" clicks. The rest is made up of bots, spiders, automated crawlers, etc.

A second point is that because Opentracker tracks unique visitors over long periods of time, visitors are rarely counted twice. Strict definitions of unique and returning visitors are used.

Here is a link to a short article on this subject:

Additionally this forum thread might be of interest, as an example of seeking specific explanations for a discrepancy:
Properties ID: 000026   Views: 6301   Updated: 2 days ago